Walking onto the basketball court as a referee, I’ve always felt that split-second decisions carry more weight than people realize. It’s not just about blowing the whistle—it’s about understanding the flow of the game, the psychology of the players, and yes, even the morale of a team coming off a tough loss. I remember one particular game where the coach mentioned afterward, "I’m very pleased. We were concerned about their moral. their spirit coming into the game because we came from a loss but maganda yung mindset nila." That phrase stuck with me. It reminded me how deeply a referee’s calls can shape a team’s spirit, for better or worse. In this guide, I’ll break down some of the most common basketball referee calls, blending rulebook precision with the kind of real-game intuition that you only develop after years on the court.
Let’s start with one of the most debated calls: the blocking foul versus the charge. Officially, a charge occurs when an offensive player makes significant contact with a defender who has established a legal guarding position. A blocking foul, on the other hand, happens if the defender is still moving or hasn’t set their feet properly. But in reality, it’s rarely that black and white. I’ve called games where the difference came down to a fraction of a second in foot placement, and honestly, sometimes I’ve second-guessed myself after seeing the replay. From my experience, referees get this wrong about 15-20% of the time at the amateur level, though NBA accuracy rates hover around 92% thanks to instant replay. What many fans don’t see is how we read players’ intentions. If an offensive player is clearly hunting for contact—leaning in, extending an arm—I’m more inclined to call an offensive foul, even if the defender’s position isn’t perfect. It’s a judgment call, and I lean toward protecting defenders who are making a legitimate effort to play solid defense.
Traveling is another call that seems straightforward but is often misunderstood. The rule states that a player who takes more than two steps without dribbling has traveled. Yet, in today’s game, especially with the evolution of step-back moves and Euro-steps, the line is blurrier than ever. I’ll admit, I’m stricter on traveling than some of my colleagues. If I see a player gain an obvious advantage by shuffling their feet, I’ll call it every time. On average, I probably call two or three travels per game at the high school level, though I suspect many more go uncalled. Data from the NCAA suggests that traveling violations are only called on about 40% of actual occurrences, largely because referees are focused on more visible contact fouls. Personally, I think the "gather step" rule has made things more confusing. When a player gathers the ball, that step doesn’t count toward the two allowed, but interpreting the gather moment is highly subjective. I’ve had coaches yell at me for being too nitpicky, but I believe consistent enforcement helps players develop better fundamentals.
Then there’s the hand-check rule, which has evolved significantly over the years. In the 1990s, defenders could get away with a lot more physicality. Today, any prolonged contact with a hand on an offensive player is usually whistled. I support this shift—it opens up the game and rewards skill over brute force. Still, calling it in real-time requires sharp eyes. If a defender places a hand on the ball-handler’s hip and maintains it for more than a second or two, that’s an easy call for me. But brief, incidental contact? I usually let that go. Stats show that hand-check fouls account for roughly 12% of all personal fouls in professional leagues, though that number spikes in youth games where defenders rely more on their hands than their feet. I’ve noticed that teams with lower morale, like the one mentioned earlier, often commit more of these fouls out of frustration. That’s where a referee’s role expands beyond rule enforcement; we have to manage the game’s emotional temperature too.
Speaking of game management, technical fouls are where psychology really comes into play. I’ve called techs for everything from overt disrespect to prolonged complaining. There’s no hard-and-fast number of warnings I give—it depends on the context. If a team is already rattled, like after a bad loss, I might be more lenient early on to avoid crushing their spirit. But once a player crosses the line, I don’t hesitate. In my career, I’ve issued roughly 30 technical fouls, and I’d say 70% of them were for verbal offenses rather than physical actions. I’ll never forget a game where a coach was riding me all night, and after a questionable no-call, he shouted something that couldn’t be ignored. I hit him with a T, and honestly, it calmed the game down. The players responded better afterward. That’s the subtle art of refereeing: sometimes a strict call restores order, while other times, swallowing the whistle keeps the game flowing. I prefer the latter when possible, but you have to read the room.
Foul calls on three-point shooters have also become a hot topic, especially with the rise of players kicking their legs out to draw contact. I hate that move. It feels like cheating, and if I see a shooter明显 exaggerating contact, I’m less likely to reward them. The rulebook says defensive players must give shooters room to land, but it doesn’t require referees to bail out offensive players who create artificial contact. In the NBA, about 18% of three-point fouls are now reviewed for this exact reason, and I think that’s a step in the right direction. From my own experience, I’ve called an average of one three-point foul per game over the past season, but I’ve also passed on several where the shooter’s intent was clearly to deceive. It’s a fine line, and I know fans sometimes kill us for it on social media, but in the moment, you have to trust your instincts.
Finally, let’s talk about the replay system. As much as I appreciate technology, I think we’re overusing it. The average NBA game now has 2.5 replay reviews, each taking around 90 seconds. That disrupts the rhythm of the game, and I’ve seen it drain the energy from arenas. I’m all for getting calls right, but at what cost? I’d prefer limiting replays to last-two-minute situations or clear-cut mistakes. Still, when it comes to block/charge calls or out-of-bounds decisions in crunch time, I’ll be the first to run to the monitor. Because at the end of the day, our job is to ensure fairness—not just for the rules, but for the spirit of the competition. Reflecting on that coach’s comment about team morale, it’s clear that every call we make ripples through the game in ways beyond the scoreboard. Whether it’s a crucial charge call that shifts momentum or a technical foul that cools tempers, we’re not just enforcing rules; we’re stewards of the game’s integrity. And in my book, that’s what makes this role so challenging and rewarding.
People in Motion (PiM) is our employee advocacy and improvement program. These cross-functional groups are comprised of employees, with an executive sponsor, who contribute ideas and drive action towards focused areas of improvement across the employee experience. The groups include: Kyruus Kontext & Business Readiness; Community, Connectivity, & Engagement; System, Tools, & Productivity; IDEA [Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Accessibility].
As a remote-first company, we are invested in employees creating a work setup that allows them to do their best work. In addition to a laptop, we also provide you with $750 to get the additional equipment you need and add an ongoing amount of $1,200 to your salary to cover remote work costs.
We value ownership at Kyruus Health, not only in the work you do but in the shared financial success from our growth. Employees will have the opportunity to grow their equity ownership throughout their tenure.
We care about creating the time you need to bond for any team members at Kyruus Health growing their families. We offer 8 weeks of fully paid leave to all parents. Birthing parents are also eligible for additional time and coverage through our Short-Term Disability plan.
We encourage all employees to save for retirement through our 401(K) plan. Employees have the option to begin contributing to their accounts on their first day of employment and we offer an employer match of up to $1,500 per calendar year for all employees who enroll.
We offer employees a lifestyle stipend of $2,000 per year to help them be well. This is designed for Kyruus Health to offset the cost for items, experiences, or home expenses that enhance team members’ well-being
We want to provide employees and families with health insurance offerings to support them getting the care they need. Our health, dental, and vision plans are desiged to allow employees the opportunity to choose options that work best for themselves and their families.
We are committed to flexibility and empowering employees to do work that matters in a way that works for them. Our unlimited PTO policy is anchored on that flexibility – encouraging employees to take time off for what’s important to them, in addition to the many company holidays we celebrate. To highlight our commitment to a healthy work-life balance, we provide a specific stipend each quarter for employees to use on a recharge day.
