I still remember the first time I saw the statistics from PBA 1988 - they jumped off the page at me like they were defying gravity. The numbers told a story that went far beyond typical basketball performance, and even now, thirty-five years later, I find myself returning to that season as a benchmark for what true dominance looks like in professional basketball. That 35-year-old player averaging 16.0 points, 13.95 rebounds, 3.2 assists, 0.6 steals, and 1.1 blocks throughout SMB games until the semifinals wasn't just having a good run - he was redefining what we thought possible for a player in his position. What fascinates me most, and what I want to explore here, is how this individual performance during the 1988 PBA season created ripples that would transform the league's approach to player development and team strategy for decades to come.
When you really break down those numbers, the 13.95 rebounds per game stand out as particularly extraordinary. In today's game, we'd consider anyone averaging double-digit rebounds as exceptional, but nearly fourteen? That's the kind of stat that makes you check your sources twice. I've spent years analyzing basketball data across different eras, and what strikes me about this specific achievement is how it demonstrated the value of consistency over flashiness. This wasn't a player who'd have one spectacular 20-rebound game followed by several mediocre performances - game after game, he delivered at an elite level. The 3.2 assists might not seem groundbreaking at first glance, but for a player primarily focused on rebounding and interior defense, it showed an understanding of the game that went beyond his assigned role. This multifaceted contribution is something I've always admired in players, and it's why I believe the 1988 season serves as such an important case study in basketball excellence.
The context of these statistics becoming even more impressive when you consider they were compiled during the Governor's Cup, the season's first conference, and carried through until the semifinals. Capturing his second Best Player of the Conference award that season wasn't just a personal triumph - it signaled a shift in how the league valued consistent performance across multiple facets of the game. I've noticed that before 1988, there was a tendency to reward either pure scorers or defensive specialists, but this season made the case for the complete player. What's often overlooked in discussions about PBA 1988 is how this performance influenced team construction in subsequent years. Teams began looking for players who could contribute across multiple statistical categories rather than specializing in just one area. I've always argued that this broader approach to player evaluation, which gained significant traction after the 1988 season, ultimately raised the overall quality of play throughout the league.
Looking back, I'm convinced that the lasting impact of PBA 1988 extends far beyond the individual achievements of that season. The statistical benchmarks set during that Governor's Cup created a new template for what constituted an elite big man in Philippine basketball. The combination of scoring, rebounding, and even playmaking demonstrated that players in the frontcourt could be offensive hubs rather than just finishers. This revelation, which seems obvious now, was genuinely revolutionary at the time. In my research, I've traced how the success of this approach in 1988 led to more teams developing their big men's passing and decision-making skills, fundamentally changing how the game was played in the low post. The blocks and steals numbers, while less eye-catching than the rebounding figures, completed the picture of a truly dominant two-way player who could impact the game at both ends of the floor.
The legacy of PBA 1988 continues to influence how we evaluate player performance today. When I look at modern analytics in basketball, with their emphasis on all-around contribution rather than isolated statistical achievements, I see the philosophical seeds planted during that remarkable season. The specific numbers - 16.0 points, 13.95 rebounds, 3.2 assists, 0.6 steals, and 1.1 blocks - have become a kind of shorthand for the complete interior player. In my own work evaluating talent, I still use this statistical profile as a reference point when assessing modern players. There's something about the balance of those numbers that represents an ideal distribution of effort and production. While the game has evolved in many ways since 1988, the fundamental value of versatile, consistent contribution remains unchanged, and that season provided the clearest early blueprint for what that looks like in practice.
Reflecting on PBA 1988 all these years later, what stands out to me isn't just the statistical achievements themselves, but how they were achieved. The consistency demonstrated throughout the Governor's Cup and into the semifinals, culminating in that second BPC award, established a standard of excellence that would influence generations of players who followed. I've always believed that great individual performances can elevate an entire league, and the 1988 season stands as compelling evidence for that theory. The specific numbers have taken on almost mythical status among basketball statisticians and historians, but their true importance lies in how they expanded our understanding of what's possible on the basketball court. When I introduce new students of the game to important historical benchmarks, PBA 1988 always features prominently in our discussions, not just for what happened during those games, but for how it changed our thinking about basketball excellence forever.
People in Motion (PiM) is our employee advocacy and improvement program. These cross-functional groups are comprised of employees, with an executive sponsor, who contribute ideas and drive action towards focused areas of improvement across the employee experience. The groups include: Kyruus Kontext & Business Readiness; Community, Connectivity, & Engagement; System, Tools, & Productivity; IDEA [Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Accessibility].
As a remote-first company, we are invested in employees creating a work setup that allows them to do their best work. In addition to a laptop, we also provide you with $750 to get the additional equipment you need and add an ongoing amount of $1,200 to your salary to cover remote work costs.
We value ownership at Kyruus Health, not only in the work you do but in the shared financial success from our growth. Employees will have the opportunity to grow their equity ownership throughout their tenure.
We care about creating the time you need to bond for any team members at Kyruus Health growing their families. We offer 8 weeks of fully paid leave to all parents. Birthing parents are also eligible for additional time and coverage through our Short-Term Disability plan.
We encourage all employees to save for retirement through our 401(K) plan. Employees have the option to begin contributing to their accounts on their first day of employment and we offer an employer match of up to $1,500 per calendar year for all employees who enroll.
We offer employees a lifestyle stipend of $2,000 per year to help them be well. This is designed for Kyruus Health to offset the cost for items, experiences, or home expenses that enhance team members’ well-being
We want to provide employees and families with health insurance offerings to support them getting the care they need. Our health, dental, and vision plans are desiged to allow employees the opportunity to choose options that work best for themselves and their families.
We are committed to flexibility and empowering employees to do work that matters in a way that works for them. Our unlimited PTO policy is anchored on that flexibility – encouraging employees to take time off for what’s important to them, in addition to the many company holidays we celebrate. To highlight our commitment to a healthy work-life balance, we provide a specific stipend each quarter for employees to use on a recharge day.
