As I sit here watching the Ateneo Blue Eagles and NU Bullpups warm up for what promises to be an electrifying championship game, I can't help but reflect on something that's been bothering me about our sports culture lately. Just last week, I came across a powerful statement that's been echoing in my mind: "Paying women's games less reinforces the harmful message that women's sports—and women themselves—are worth less." While we're here debating which boys' team will take home the trophy, I wonder if we're missing the bigger picture about how we value athletic competitions in general.
Let me be perfectly honest here—I've been covering high school basketball for over fifteen years, and this season has been particularly fascinating. The Ateneo-NU rivalry has reached fever pitch, with both teams showing incredible form throughout the season. Ateneo comes in with their signature disciplined offense, having maintained an impressive 85% field goal percentage throughout the playoffs, while NU counters with what I consider the most aggressive defense in recent memory, forcing an average of 18 turnovers per game. But beyond the statistics, what really makes this matchup compelling is how it represents two distinct basketball philosophies clashing at the highest level.
I remember watching both teams during the elimination rounds, and there was one particular game where Ateneo's point guard, Miguel Torres, executed what I'd call the most brilliant fourth-quarter comeback I've seen in junior basketball. Down by 12 points with just four minutes remaining, he orchestrated plays that seemed to defy physics, ultimately securing a two-point victory that had the entire arena on their feet. That single performance demonstrated why many consider Ateneo the team to beat, though personally, I've always had a soft spot for NU's underdog spirit.
The numbers don't lie—Ateneo has won 14 of their last 16 games, while NU comes in with a slightly better defensive record, allowing only 68.3 points per game compared to Ateneo's 71.2. But statistics only tell part of the story. Having spoken to coaches from both camps, I get the sense that NU has been preparing specifically for Ateneo's offensive schemes, spending approximately 70% of their practice time developing counter-strategies. Meanwhile, Ateneo's coach told me they've been focusing on maintaining their rhythm rather than adjusting too much to opponents, which could either be brilliant confidence or dangerous arrogance—we'll find out soon enough.
What many casual observers might not realize is how much these junior teams influence the collegiate recruitment landscape. From my experience covering the transition of players to the UAAP, approximately 60% of standout junior athletes receive scholarship offers, with the championship MVP almost guaranteed a spot in the senior division. This adds another layer of pressure that these young athletes must handle, something I've seen break some players while elevating others to legendary status.
Now, let me share something that might surprise you. While everyone's focused on the star players, I believe the championship will be decided by the bench depth. In last year's finals, we saw how fatigue affected the starting five in the fourth quarter, and the team with stronger reserves ultimately prevailed. This season, NU's second unit has been scoring an average of 28 points per game compared to Ateneo's 22, which could prove decisive if the game goes down to the wire.
I've noticed something interesting about the coaching styles too. Ateneo's approach is more systematic, almost military in its precision, while NU encourages more creative plays and individual initiative. Having observed both teams throughout the season, I'm leaning toward NU's philosophy being more effective in high-pressure situations, though I acknowledge this puts me in the minority among my colleagues. There's just something about the way NU players adapt to unexpected situations that reminds me of championship teams from the past.
The venue might play a bigger role than people expect. The game's at Araneta Coliseum, which holds approximately 16,000 spectators, and from my experience, the crowd dynamics there can significantly impact player performance. Ateneo typically draws larger crowds, which could either inspire their players or add unbearable pressure. I recall a championship game three years ago where the favored team crumbled under the weight of expectation from their own supporters—a cautionary tale for today's contenders.
As tip-off approaches, I keep thinking about how we measure success in sports. We're so focused on who wins and loses, but the real value lies in what these young athletes learn about teamwork, perseverance, and sportsmanship. The same principle applies to how we value different sports—whether it's women's basketball or junior divisions, each deserves recognition and respect beyond just the scoreboard. When we dismiss certain games as less important, we're essentially telling those athletes their efforts don't matter as much.
After considering all factors—current form, historical performance, coaching strategies, and my own observations throughout the season—I'm predicting NU will win by a narrow margin, probably 75-72. Their resilience in close games and deeper bench gives them the edge, though I wouldn't be surprised if Ateneo proves me wrong. Whatever happens, what matters most is that we appreciate the incredible dedication these young athletes demonstrate every time they step on the court. They're not just playing for a trophy—they're building character and creating memories that will last long after the final buzzer sounds.
People in Motion (PiM) is our employee advocacy and improvement program. These cross-functional groups are comprised of employees, with an executive sponsor, who contribute ideas and drive action towards focused areas of improvement across the employee experience. The groups include: Kyruus Kontext & Business Readiness; Community, Connectivity, & Engagement; System, Tools, & Productivity; IDEA [Inclusion, Diversity, Equity, Accessibility].
As a remote-first company, we are invested in employees creating a work setup that allows them to do their best work. In addition to a laptop, we also provide you with $750 to get the additional equipment you need and add an ongoing amount of $1,200 to your salary to cover remote work costs.
We value ownership at Kyruus Health, not only in the work you do but in the shared financial success from our growth. Employees will have the opportunity to grow their equity ownership throughout their tenure.
We care about creating the time you need to bond for any team members at Kyruus Health growing their families. We offer 8 weeks of fully paid leave to all parents. Birthing parents are also eligible for additional time and coverage through our Short-Term Disability plan.
We encourage all employees to save for retirement through our 401(K) plan. Employees have the option to begin contributing to their accounts on their first day of employment and we offer an employer match of up to $1,500 per calendar year for all employees who enroll.
We offer employees a lifestyle stipend of $2,000 per year to help them be well. This is designed for Kyruus Health to offset the cost for items, experiences, or home expenses that enhance team members’ well-being
We want to provide employees and families with health insurance offerings to support them getting the care they need. Our health, dental, and vision plans are desiged to allow employees the opportunity to choose options that work best for themselves and their families.
We are committed to flexibility and empowering employees to do work that matters in a way that works for them. Our unlimited PTO policy is anchored on that flexibility – encouraging employees to take time off for what’s important to them, in addition to the many company holidays we celebrate. To highlight our commitment to a healthy work-life balance, we provide a specific stipend each quarter for employees to use on a recharge day.
